The Bowerbird
The Lover is akin to the bowerbird that asks its mate to build the nest together: one part each and at a time – the dance of love, like playing chess, one piece at a time but no-one wins and no-one loses. There is no check-mate.
The Death of Tragedy
How do we finally remember to enjoy life? How do we finally learn to forget the tragedy of life? It seems, after a certain temporal point, our job has been to find a means to cure a deeply rooted depressive virus concerning existence – its tragedy thereof.
Once upon a time existence was not a problem, it was a solution. Once upon a time existence was not a misery, it was an enjoyment. Once upon a time to live was not to struggle, it was to love. Once upon a time existence was not a constant drag, it was a dance. Once upon a time.
Where did that time go? How can a being decide to ally itself, its existence, with a most destructive tragedy, in rejection to the allying with an enjoyment? Is it really shame and society that brought this about? Or was it the destiny of a particular being? Was it necessary, or a most unfortunate accident?
The demon of tomorrow…
I am a walker. I walk the dreary road of existence with a smile befitting any fool who fancies himself a lover of life and thinker of the world. A road worthy of those who are too much for the too-little. A road marked out conspicuously for those who fall on the outskirts of what-is-given. For those who court the skirts of the new, the original, the alive, the creative, the sublime, the self-surpassing. One fine morning I watch upon that which makes my heart tingle with life. I look upon that which makes me burst with a fire from my bosom and sends a pleasant current to my head, making my face extend a warm smile. That which awakens me from torpor – she, is more to the point. I am, alas, at the heights of the romantic age, I am a young man. Yet, this day is different from all the rest, a demon decides to make my acquaintance. A demon who’s truly an angel in disguise, here to test my strength of heart – here to test just how much power is me, and I am her. There is a yardstick to power my good friend, a good healthy and simple yardstick for measurement of power. It’s not in metres, centimetres or miles, no, it is in degree of attachment. A lesson I learned the hard way from an angel disguised as the demon of tomorrow, which we shall call Kalxara. It spoke thus to me:
Kalxara: I see thou thinkest and feelest most deeply for she. Thou art a remarkable man.
Me, You, No-one: I think and feel yes, but why don’t I do?
Kalxara: Thou knowest the result of thy doing before time, thy doing prematurely.
Me, You, No-one: Yes, but I yearn emphatically for her embrace, for her touch, her kiss, her hand on my heart, her head on my bosom, my hand on her head and playing with beautiful, short, blonde hair.
Kalxara: Thou are a true romantic, an emblem of thy age. For thy distance arises not from distance, it arises from intense proximity. Thou fight thyself most profoundly for thy desire. Thou fight thy desire for desire itself, thou fight love for love itself. Thou art a silly man to the world, but an emblem to and for its future. Thou pushest the world to its limit, and in the process, thou causeth thyself harm.
Me, You, No-one: Oh, how you understand me. And how you bring misery to my paradox. You know I’m sure of my capability, you also know my desire. You know how easy doing is, how simple it is to do. Yet, something inside fights me, it will not allow it. It implores me, and reasons with me to be patient, to allow, to be open.
Kalxara: That it does, and it pains thee so. Does it not?
Me, You, No-one: Yes, it does, it really does. But why? Why this tension, why this torment? What am I being prepared for, what is testing me so?
Kalxara: I will tell thee. Rather, I will show thee. I will also speed thee up, take thy preparation, clutch it and place it a gear higher. Dost thou liketh this idea?
Me, You, No-one: … Show me.
Kalxara: Let thy eye rest upon thy beauty. Let it fall upon her and feel her presence. Let the emotions betake thee, thinkest and feelest most deeply for her, as thee always do. Now, I will tell thee the truth about thy beloved whose name thou knowest not – what a hopeless romantic thou art, what a work of art, what a bizarre creation, truly incomparable. I will tell thee, for I am after-all a demon and I know the minds of the mortals, all too well. I hear her think and feel.
Me, You, No-one: I understand.
Kalxara: She cares not for thee. She has seen thee and thou have seen her, and she thinks thee handsome, but shares not thy passion. She loves thee not. She thinks thee only interesting, but she harbours a passion that’s not to thy degree.
Me, You, No-one: *With a smile.* I understand…
Kalxara: She is most hopelessly in love – it is not with thee. She wishes to be wed, and the future holds her wedding, two children and happiness, but not with thee…
Me, You, No-one: I understand… do continue… I see in your eyes more waiting to pour forth from within you.
Kalxara: She finds more interesting thy friend than thee. Thou art nothing compared to thy friend – thou seemeth emotionally decayed and oft over-confident, thou shineth arrogance in her eyes. She thinks thee a liar and a fake, she thinks thee a child. How dost thou feelest?
Me, You, No-one: I desire and love her more.
Kalxara: But she cares not for thee, thou art nothing but a passing glimpse, a passing feeling, a fleeting candle light that gives itself away in smoke as it is confronted by life’s winds, by life’s temporal gusts. Thou art not as important to her as as she is to thee. What dost thou hold onto?
Me, You, No-one: For the first time in my life… nothing. I am. It is. She is. We are. I hold on to nothing. Finally I can now feel… free. I can now not own or be owned, I can finally… be… I can love at last. Whether she loves me or not, or I love her or not, it matters not – so long as she is happy, and I am also. The feeling speaks its own language, and my distance, my paradox does its own job. I am incapable of judging. I can only admire, and I can only celebrate. I can only live… as I am… as I feel… I can only be.
Kalxara: I have lied to you.
Then, out of nowhere, Kalxara tore her clothes apart and revealed herself to me. She flicked her fine, long and radiant blonde hair back, spread her beautiful wings sending a gust in my direction that almost blinds me. Saluting me with a wink, a nod and a smile, she thrusts her wings and flies away.
The modern yardstick of power: attachment.
Nature’s Mistake
Nature doesn’t make mistakes, errors; alas, she knows not how. She, like a good mother, makes a profound selection. The question is, why then is that selection is hierarchical, and why does hierarchy seem to imply an error in the division of high and low, in the evaluative division. The evaluative seems to imply the erroneous through the notion of the low. Yet, what is this error that you speak of? By what criterion do you measure this error, by what criterion is something low and high? Stop, for a second, and redirect the hierarchy you have erected as the absolute for nature and her children – redirect and rethink it, try to do so temporally. Look at this hierarchy and ask: is it truly absolute, is the distinction made self-standing and non-malleable. All distinctions are malleable to a certain degree: it’s a linguistic tool, a dissection. What is dissected can be done so in different ways. Such is the strength of quantification and qualification.
Nature’s hierarchy is grounded on difference, the difference whose spawns and trajectories are affinity and similarity as opposed to homogeneity and identity. That’s why a criterion, what we see as a criterion (rigid and eternal) is lacking. The trick is to view the mode of comparison concealed in a value – what mode of comparison shows its ugly head? There are two modes of comparison, given a quantity: one to one or one to many, but always implying minimally two things that are placed under a comparison. Such is the birth of value: the comparison between (at minimum) two ‘things’ – in the broadest sense of the word. Yet, this is incomplete, how is a comparison made? We compare two things, set them up against each other, but for what do we look, how do we compare them? Some have stressed power is the ultimate mode of comparison. Others have stressed it is capacity for survival. Others still contend it is quantity itself, the more of it, the more valuable. Yet, precisely in this lies the difference that grounds all hierarchy. Thus, it is wiser to say that hierarchy itself is different, and affinitive. There is never one and only hierarchical quality. There is a quantity of hierarchies, each qualitatively distinct from the next. Nature blends quantity and quality most beautifully. It’s us and thought, the kind of thought arising from language taken too far that seeks to split the two apart; to make one the ground of the other.
Nature blends the two most artistically, and then laughs at the one who seeks to establish one on top of the other. She laughs and constantly conceals her face with a most conspicuous masquerade, a humble smile and an inspiring silence: the true feat of error. There is no problem, no error to nature. There is simply a selection that selects itself, by simply being as it is, what it is and how it is…
The untimely promise of a distant horizon…
Thus spoke the distant horizon as it peeked from behind the rigid, decaying and arid wall of the contemporary social wilderness - ah, how it flocks to the other with a bitter and awful gait:
“Give me your heart. Now, watch with tear-drenched eyes as I take it apart, split it into a thousand pieces, squeeze it out of all life, and do all manners of things to it. Watch how I make you lose yourself, how I strip you naked, such that nothing of you or it is left. Nothing but my eyes on you, my eyes on yours. Do you still love me? Wait… why do I do it? - Because I am afraid that you do not mean it, because I am afraid that it is not real. I want to know for sure. I want to break your heart and see if it really does break? Does it break, is it real?”
Its echoing voice had a subtle energy to it, a slow and seductive pitch that made me imagine a siren awaiting with arms wide open on the other side. I revealed a smile, but sooner than I would have liked it was turned on its head and accompanied by a furrowed brow as the voice commensed once more:
“It’s ok, don’t fear, and don’t fret – watch me. Watch now how I put it back together, how I mend a metaphor, how I make the unreal real. Magic you wonder? Not at all. Watch me give you your heart back, better than when you once gave it to me. Watch your heart beat with more convition. Watch more love flow from its core, and how much more penetrating and vibrant it makes the rest of your body. Watch. How do I do it you wonder… how? It’s simple. It never broke in the first place, it was all an illusion. Once you see me from behind this wall, once you decide to step into this world I envisage, to step with me over this stupid, ugly and decrepit wall, you will see. You will see the metaphor, that silly little linguistic trick that’s got us all weak in the knees from exhaustion and self-condemnation. That stupid metaphor that’s got us bowing down in shame and mediocrity. Mediocrity we have become, unable to look up, unable to walk straight and with a smile. I am tired of the same sea of facial expression: of frowns, anger and fear – it is boring. The boredom is from the fact that it arises from a metaphor – a stupid linguistic tool. What is it you wonder? If I knew, then I wouldn’t be behind this wall – please jump over and bloody snap out of it.”
I was astonished, my eyes drenched in tears. My heart beating at an uncontrollable pace. I suddenly stopped, took a deep breath and with utter conviction attempted to climb. I have been climbing ever since, but climbing with a smile that could shine a room brighter than a lamp – a gift from a distant horizon.
Writing and expression
Sometimes your whole world can be shaken, stirred and begin to slowly corrode simply out of a desire to express. To express something that’s bubbling up inside, which begins to burn you from the inside out, until you finally open the lid and let it overflow. A whole world of its own boils underneath, awaiting the right moment to flow and overflow, until it consumes everything and you with it.
The Bourgeois, the Seducer and the Lover
The room is lit with a piercing glow, whose source is the vertically affluent lamp above their TGI Fridays cubicle. It is a most unpleasant evening; cold, wintry and the raindrops batter at your skin with every step you bravely decide to take in the deluge. Dinner seemed the most convenient option for these three and their ‘lad’s night out’. The food had long been over and they were now enjoying a beer or two, and a conversation most becoming of three bachelors out on a Friday night. Jack speaks of the dates he’s been in with the recent woman in his life. Jack’s a very down-to-earth kind of fellow, quite introverted, polite, well educated and successful in his field – Accounting and Finance. Mark on the other hand, is a very energetic and extroverted man, left school very early, but made the most of his life in all areas, a live-fast kind of guy – he now works for an Estate Agency and owns a few properties here and there. Ren on the other hand is an eccentric fellow, not much is known about him. Ren is the kind of man who lurks in the shadows beaming with light to one and all – they’ve become accustomed to his peculiar ways.
Jack: She’s 5”4, blonde and hazel eyes. We met during a conference, she works for the sales guys on the third flour. We’ve been on three dates so far, I really don’t want to mess it up.
Mark: You’ve had sex?
Jack: No, not yet. Her idea. She says she doesn’t want to rush things and that she doesn’t sleep with guys until she’s ready. She’s had too many bad experiences in the past.
Mark: So what did you say to that?
Jack: What could I say? I accepted. I like the girl, I don’t meet many like her. She’s out of my league I tell you! Plus, I really like her, I want to be in a relationship with her.
Mark: You can’t be serious? Fuck that! I mean… yeah, fuck that! You want a relationship without sex? You’re going the right way about it. This girl is having sex with someone else while you wait, I promise you. Girls don’t want to wait, and no they’re not worried about rushing things. They’re worried that there are only two kinds of men in the world: nice guys and bad boys. They don’t believe in the in-between, so what they do is they arrange the nice-guy for one show, and the bad-boy for the other show. One is the fashion show, the other is the fuck-show. My good friend you’re headed for the fashion show, you’re heading for the husband category – the nice guy with the good job but who she knows can’t excite her, but can definitely take care of her.
Jack: What are you talking about? She’s not like that.
Mark: If you think so, she’s done her job well. Jack get it together buddy, if you want something from a woman, tell her! Don’t hold your feelings back because you don’t want to offend. Be true to yourself.
Jack: I don’t want to offend her though. You know what girls are like about these things, they don’t want to feel like hoes.
Mark: Hehehe, au contraire! They love to feel like hoes! They just don’t like to think they are hoes. Jack, I am not saying make her feel like a hoe, I’m saying don’t deny and hide yourself and your feelings in hope that it will get you score-points from her! That’s ridiculous, be true to yourself and to her – it’ll turn her on even more. Then seduce her, of course.
Jack: What? No way! Girls don’t want to be seduced, they want to be courted and complimented. You buy her dinner, treat her like a lady, be polite, nice and caring. That’s how you charm a girl.
Mark: Jack. You’ve got it all wrong. Somewhere, somehow you’ve been misled. Women love to be seduced, they love to feel desired and naughty. They love to feel alive. Forget the other bullshit. Don’t date her. Do what I do: meet her, make her laugh a little, take her for a coffee, blow her mind then blow her brains. After tell her how it’s going to be and no other way, no reasons either; she don’t like it, then she can go. What those things are are entirely up to you: marriage, relationship, friends with benefits, just friends etc.
Jack: You use women. I don’t want to be associated with that repute. I refuse to make women objects and playthings. I don’t want to take advantage of women.
Mark: There is no advantage my good friend. All is fair. Love is a game, you either play to win or play to lose – either way it is down to you. Play the game and lose, but get better, or don’t play the game and always lose forever. Every woman you will meet will play a power-game with you, there’s no avoiding it. We are hierarchical creatures, even love is a hierarchical relationship. You are either a master or a slave, a creditor or a debtor. Choose Jack.
Jack: No way, that’s bullshit. I don’t believe that, I believe in Romance.
Mark: Romance is the battlefield of love. It is where the war is settled, where you either win or lose. The more romantic you are, the worse it is, the true romantic hides his romance from the world, but blinds his woman and his woman alone with its torch. The true romantic makes a gesture that is seen by her and her alone. A gesture that the world looks upon and sees nothing, but she looks and sees the world. That is how you win Jack, by giving her what she has never had but always dreamt of and yearned, that’s how you gain power over woman – that is how you seduce her. And she wants this with every fibre, every ounce of her body and soul. Whoever lied to you about what women want, ignore them, they don’t know women. I have a feeling women themselves told you what they want, but evidently failed to tell you that what they want is what they feel, not what they think. Women are flawed in that they know when it is there, and they forget when it is gone; they cannot think their feelings, but they can feel their thoughts. This is the paradox that is woman. Understand this paradox, and you will have women at your feet.
Jack: …
Mark: Trust me about this, let’s ask Ren, he’s the thinker amongst us. Plus, you’ve been awfully quiet Ren, why so? Why not speak? I know you know all this, I know your potential, I even know your heart. It hurts you doesn’t it Ren?
Ren: You’re a fascinating guy, Mark. You are right, everything you say is absolutely right. The world and woman is as you say it is. You’re well read, and you’ve listened to me well in the past – listened and applied most affluently it seems.
Mark: If but you had the courage to practice what you know Ren, you would be unstoppable, and I know you know and can do more. Women would weep for you upon mere contact with you. Yet, for some bizarre reason, you struggle with yourself like our friend Jack here. You refuse to accept the truths you understand, and you know them for truths.
Ren: Truth is a hefty concept Mark, you know how I feel about big concepts like that, hehe. Speaking of concepts, there are two categories of concepts Mark. These two categories is why I do not speak, and why I know what you say works and is right. The last two and a half thousand years have been spent on trying to eliminate one category in favour of the other. Now, people like me, are trying our hardest to revive that category, to give it life once more. This is why I do not practice what I understand. Because although things are like what you say, it doesn’t in any way imply that they can’t be otherwise or that they should be as such. A fact is that powerless, it works only once it has passed, apart from that a fact is useless. Even facts are interpreted and brought to bear upon the person who interprets.
Mark: You’re too smart Ren, if only you stopped and lived for a second. If only you switched your head off and lived what you understand, if only you tasted that bit of life that I tasted with your help. That blonde, that brunette, that red-head…
Ren: I am not smart, not at all, I just have too much energy to burn. Too much passion. Too much heart, that it cannot be satisfied as easily as you assume and as easily as your very own heart is satisfied.
Mark: Women love you. Every woman I’ve introduced you to always asks me about you, she always wants to know, and I never know what to say. What do you do to them? And why don’t you finish what you start? They are always disappointed by your distance and lack of involvement – disappointed and turned on, they love your mysterious ways. Yet, they always think that you are too good for them, they think that you do not fancy them. I am always bewildered, for I do not know what to tell them, for you do not speak about it to nobody.
Ren: There are two categories of concepts: concepts of reason and concepts of passion. These are things I have never spoken to you about, and these three things are precisely why you are right and also why you are wrong. Love, Faith and Self are the three concepts of passion, the only ones I can think of, that stop me from talking. In their presence I tremble and am likely to weep, sometimes with joy, sometimes with melancholy, other times just laugh or fall completely silent. These three I cannot speak of, my heart screams at their mere mention and my body is consumed by a current and I cannot control myself and the emotions arising from their mere mention or presence. These words are glitches; mere glitches in language, and I have no idea how they found their way in – for they’re furthest removed from language than anything. I cannot speak of women Mark because although what you say is true, you make one and only one assumption: that you know two of the three concepts inside out and can manipulate them to seduce. You claim to know the Self and Love. What you know is what the women you meet know but a little more, a little more that I gave to you and nobody gave to them. You will meet your match though Mark, someone will seduce you. I speak not of those three, for they are not be spoken about, they are to be lived, felt, experienced, cried over, laughed over, angered over, desired…
Mark: Why is it that what I do works to give me what I want though, and what I do is what I know; what you’ve helped me understand?
Ren: It works because we’ve spent the last two and half thousand years making sure it would work. We’ve conditioned ourselves to make it work. We’ve brought reason to passion and sold it at a cheap price. Where once Love was something people celebrated and died for, now Love is being sold to the highest bidder, sometimes to the lowest. Where Self was something respected and admired, now it likewise is being sold and made a science of. We’ve made automata of people and then wonder why these things work so mechanically. We wonder why prejudices are so consistent and why we’re in an age where if it wasn’t for drugs or alcohol, a ripple of suicides would spread from one corner of the industrial globe to the next. We see all these things, and like idiots blame the symptom, we think its the symptom’s fault, unbeknownst to us that the symptom is not the disease – it is not the source. We’ve been trying to cure symptoms for much too long, we’ve forgotten that a symptom is a sign, not the thing that does the signalling. I do not speak because I weary of this, I weary of the mediocrity. So I sit here and wait, just wait for a light, something that makes me come back out of the depths, out of the shadows, where it’s safe but lonely for people like me. Meanwhile I wait and do what I can to aid us to reach that day, where we’ve finally surpassed this painful torpor we’ve entered, this mechanic existence we’ve bestowed ourselves with. I wait.
Mark: What about the power relationship you spoke to me about, and how power is more seductive when it’s subtly taken, than when given, especially with women. That has to be something real and eternal.
Ren: That is the plant with the deepest roots into our social existence. Power is the biggest and most necessary illusion. I told you a truth that aided you to live in a time where that truth had its import, but all truths are in their context and made so by relations with other things that condition it as much as it conditions them. Power cannot play a role without people, but it does so nonetheless because people have erected it as something beyond them – as a possession. The most powerful person is the one who doesn’t understand what power is, who has forgotten the very concept and it plays no role in their life. The one who has forgotten it, by becoming it. One doesn’t give or take power, one is power. To be power is to forget all games, all war. Only he who is not powerful goes to war, and they go to war for power – because they lack it, or, which comes to the same thing, they need more of it. If you were power and power was you, why go to war? Power seduces only those who have power and those who do not. Power can’t seduce someone who is power. This is the problem Mark. I cannot seduce women. I cannot even date them like Jack does. I cannot even admire them. I can’t do any of those things. All I can do is love them, such that when I hear the word Love, or see a woman that my body desires, I am stunned, I see eternity. I see life itself and I am stunted. Unable to speak and unable to move, I am only able to be drenched in the vision, consumed by the experience. Be in utter awe, in utter love, in utter desire. And I cannot, not even for a minute, think it through, I am lost in it and right after I forget what happened.
Mark: …
Jack: … I don’t understand.
Mark: In other words, he is crazy.
Ren: Hahaha!
It was getting late, and they all had engagements in the morning. Ren was preparing a presentation. Jack has family guests over from abroad. Whilst Mark had a hot girl pass by for a coffee in the afternoon and he was always a late sleeper.
Wittgenstein
This aphorism in the Philosophical Investigations is by far the most important aphorism to understanding this man’s life project concerning the role of meaning, language and philosophy.
—–
304. “But you will surely admit that there is a difference between pain-behaviour accompanied by pain and pain-behaviour without any pain?” – Admit it? What greater difference could there be? – “And yet you again and again reach the conclusion that the sensation itself is a nothing.” – Not at all. It is not a something, but not a nothing either! The conclusion was only that a nothing would serve just as well as a something about which nothing could be said. We have only rejected the grammar which tries to force itself on us here.
The paradox disappears only if we make a radical break with the idea that language always functions in one way, always serves the same purpose: to convey thoughts – which may be about horses, pains, good and evil, or anything else you please.
—-
And behold, we see Wittgenstein’s concern with Philosophy, and Philosophy’s concern with herself, brought together under a fascinating little question:
How do quality and quantity relate, and what role does language play in that relation?
Wittgenstein’s emphasis on praxis over theoria concerning language and its role in philosophical engagement is fascinating, and an element of Philosophy in need of careful consideration. Aristotle was right to distinguish the activities of men in to three (with poiesis as the third), but was he too hasty on their interrelatedness – and on the favouring of the theoria? For was theoria to be the way to experience the other two in a good way. Bergson too witnessed the tension between these - the effects the former (praxis) had on the latter (theoria), and vice verse. Both Mr. Ludwig and Bergson drew a sharp and careful distinction between the two. Where the future of philosophy lies depends on these tensions.
The fleeting words of a sharp silence…
“You know you’re ready for Love, when and only when you’ve found mother and father in yourself and not in the beloved. Until then, tears, anger, frustration, hate and nihilism are your eternal courtship and currency of every romantic encounter.”
The Prejudgment
People, more often than not, will prejudge only in order to feel better about themselves, and the beliefs that ground that self; not because they mean it, or because they are malicious at heart. Prejudgment stems always from fear of another, from fear of anything but oneself, not from hate. Prejudgment is a reaction to the possible dissolution of a self, when and only when, faced with something appealing – people will only prejudge things they find to a distant degree appealing and interesting. Thus, prejudgment is a reflection of oneself, not of another, for more than one reason.